Thread: snowy picture
View Single Post
Old March 18th 18, 07:41 AM posted to
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
Posts: 7,250
Default snowy picture

Yes and nowadays of course the signal breaks up a bit with bloccky stuff and
vanishes altogether.
Does anyone recall that Indian satellite that did direct broadcast on uhf
using fm, but could be resolved by slope detection using an am receiver. It
was actually only seeable for a short time when it was under test before
its final positioning unfortunately.
It was way over the top end onf band five.

Times have certainly changed. Brian

----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
When we had analogue TV and the signal to noise ratio was poor we would
say the picture was snowy.

When we had satellite TV with FM video and the signal to noise ratio was
poor we would say the picture had sparklies. They were white or black. You
had to tune the receiver to the midpoint where the white and black were
about the same intensity.

On modern HD CCTV snow can look like sparkles. Not at all like 'snow'! We
should have called 'snow' sparklies. But how were we to know?

Anyway, I well remember the excitement when I first dragged in a feeble
CNN from 27.5W, sometime in the 1980s. I used to watch CNN a lot after
that, then it was fascinating meeting some of the people I'd seen on
screen when years later I worked for CNN at their various London premises.