![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.tv.sky (Sky Television) (uk.tech.tv.sky ) Technical issues of Sky television. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been using a IR to Radio type IR extender for a long time, but
it's a bit unreliable. I've been very impressed with the reliability of Sky's own Magic Eye, which works through the TV aerial co-ax cable instead of via radio. However, I was wondering if these work through signal amplifiers? My current situation is that I have the Sky TV UHF signal sent to a signal amplifier, which then sends it up some very poor quality co-ax that came with the house to the loft, where there is a 4-way signal amplifier and splitter which distributes the signal to the 4 bedrooms. Will the Sky Magic Eye work OK passing through these signal amplifiers? Or will the amplifiers block the signal? Can I have a Magic Eye in more than one room? Or are you limited to just one? -- Vincent |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:12:58 +0100, Bob Latham
wrote: I could understand this more if you were amplifying the aerial signal prior to reaching the Sky box but going through two amplifiers after the sky box is probably not the best idea. Surely it can't be that hard to replace the poor coax for the feed to the loft? I should explain... I'm using the signal amplifier's sort of backwards. I don't use an aerial at all, as everything is done through Sky, but the UHF signal coming out of the Sky box is extremely weak by the time it gets to some of my TVs in other rooms. To be clear... the Sky box is the source of the UHF signal that I'm amplifying, not an aerial. The way the house was wired up, is it has a TV aerial socket in every bedroom, and the main room. All of those have a length of co-ax connected to them that runs up the walls to the loft. So in the loft there are 5 co-ax cables coming from the four TV aerial sockets in the bedrooms and the one from the main room. I have tried replacing the co-ax, but unfortunately it looks like insulation was injected into the walls after the co-ax was added and it's like they're all glued in. Also, I can't easily get new cables down for the same reason. Originally, I only had a TV in the main room and one bedroom. So I just connected the "TV Out" from the Sky box into the aerial socket in the main room, which then sends that signal up the wall to the loft. I then connected that cable in the loft to one going to the bedroom, and the then the aerial socket in the bedroom to the TV. I could then watch Sky! However the signal was very weak. So, I added a signal booster in the main room (e.g. Sky box TV out - Signal Booster - Wall socket - up wall to loft - down wall to bedroom socket - TV). That was fine. However when I got additional TVs in the other bedroom, the signal was too weak again, so I got a 4-way splitter amplifier which solved that problem too. The feed from the main room goes into the input on the signal amplifier, and the four outputs feed the four bedrooms. Everything is fine, apart from changing channels. These IR to RF extenders work OK in the rooms very close to the Sky box, but rarely and intermittently in the other two rooms which are further away. Hence thinking about Sky's magic eye, as it's hard wired. Distribution amplifiers like this one http://www.beststuff.co.uk/store/SLx...-Amplifier.htm will work fine, not only passing the remote signals back from multiple magic eyes but also supplying the DC to power the eyes. Look for the B suffix as in SLx6B. That's awesome, it sounds like exactly what I need. I can probably do away with the signal amplifier in the main room - I've never tested it without it. This could then send the signals to the various TVs in the house from the loft, and the Sky Eye could pass through it back to the Sky box. I guess I could always buy a Sky Eye first, test it, and if it doesn't work try that amplifier. Thanks for your help! Much appreciated. -- Vincent |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:23:44 +0100, Bob Latham
wrote: You could probably use one of those to bypass your first amplifier if you insist it is needed though to be honest, the signal from the rf2 on a sky box is normally adequate to drive a distribution box in the loft. If it isn't then you must have considerable loss in that coax going up to the loft. It makes only a tiny bit of difference, it's not worth it. Really it's just there historically. I'd never tried it without it. You might try running a length of new decent coax temporarily up the stairs from the sky box to the loft to prove it. In fact I've just done exactly this. I happened to have a 20 extension meter lead. The conclusion is that it definitely needs the amplifier in the loft, even just for one TV, and it needs an additional amplifier in the furthest bedroom from the amplifier - testing a different co-ax lead here makes little difference, it's just the distance. So it looks like I need one of those 6-way amplifiers you linked previously, plus one of those bypasses from Maplin. plus some Sky Eyes. Thank you! -- Vincent |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|