|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 10th 03, 06:39 PM
posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
Pace DTVA vs Nokia Mediamaster 9850T
I have borrowed a Pace DTVA and get all but 2 of the muxes. I am
thinking of buying a second-hand Nokia Mediamaster 9850T. Has anyone compared these two to see how their performance differs in terms of being able to decode muxes in a marginal signal area? -- Peter Crighton Email To: 
|
|
#2
July 11th 03, 11:02 AM
posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pace DTVA vs Nokia Mediamaster 9850T
"Peter Crighton" wrote
I have borrowed a Pace DTVA and get all but 2 of the muxes. I am thinking of buying a second-hand Nokia Mediamaster 9850T. If you're having reception difficulties, try a SetPal which does better than other boxes, certainly better than the old Nokia.
|
|
#3
July 11th 03, 05:26 PM
posted to uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pace DTVA vs Nokia Mediamaster 9850T
Some bloke wrote:
"Peter Crighton" wrote I have borrowed a Pace DTVA and get all but 2 of the muxes. I am thinking of buying a second-hand Nokia Mediamaster 9850T. If you're having reception difficulties, try a SetPal which does better than other boxes, certainly better than the old Nokia. Yeah, true. The Nokia 8950T does like a good signal. Not the best for fringe reception. Clem
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
