![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thought I'd post this here in case anyone's interested, with the Strictly
final being broadcast in 3D and Planet Dinosaur early next year: http://www.john-legon.co.uk/3d-view.htm It's slightly crazy but it works... :-) -- John Legon |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 30/11/2011 14:48, John Legon wrote:
Thought I'd post this here in case anyone's interested, with the Strictly final being broadcast in 3D and Planet Dinosaur early next year: http://www.john-legon.co.uk/3d-view.htm It's slightly crazy but it works... :-) I still live in the hope that www.electricaldiscount.co.uk will send me the 3D Glasses which were supposed to come with the Samsung TV that I ordered last July! I would however like an idiots guide as to how 3D are supposed to work, in terms of the role played by the TV and the source, a satellite receiver in my case. Some times I get two pictures next to each other, sometimes I get fuzzy mode (much as I saw in a demo in Currys) and sometimes the images can be above and below each other. My satellite receiver can be confused by some 3D channels (Dolby 3D on 23.5e) which switch it into side by side 3D mode so that the On Screen Displays generated by the receiver itself (i.e. menu. epg etc) appear twice after I have switch back to a normal channel, but I just get a normal single picture. Also when I switch to the Dolby 3D channel, my Samsung TV prompts me to select 3D mode. -- Michael Chare |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 30/11/2011 16:30, Brian Gaff wrote:
All of this seems to be a complete waste of time. I was talking to some people who had been to this Lion King thing in 3D, and they say its like watching one of those children's theatres with cut out animals moved on bits of card. I guess animations are just computer 3Dised then, which would make them look cardboard. its all a bit of a gimmick. Brian AIUI 3D TV is not a big seller, however if you buy a good quality TV you tend to get 3D anyway. The Currys' demo I saw was jut computer generated stuff so not very interesting to me anyway. However, "They" broadcast some of Wimbledon in 3D this year. That might have been interesting to see. -- Michael Chare |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Chare mUNDERSCOREnews@charedotorgdotuk wrote:
: The Currys' demo I saw was jut computer generated stuff so not very : interesting to me anyway. However, "They" broadcast some of Wimbledon in : 3D this year. That might have been interesting to see. Yes - I do not have a 3D set (and will only get it if comes "by default" with the next set) but I have some 3D Wimbledon recorded on my PVR to watch in that case! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Chare wrote:
AIUI 3D TV is not a big seller, however if you buy a good quality TV you tend to get 3D anyway. Not sure about the big seller bit but I do wonder what the point is of having a 3d tv. Surely you are paying for something that is of very little use. A bit like an umbrella with a sunroof? -- David Kennedy http://www.anindianinexile.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Gaff wrote:
All of this seems to be a complete waste of time. I was talking to some people who had been to this Lion King thing in 3D, and they say its like watching one of those children's theatres with cut out animals moved on bits of card. I guess animations are just computer 3Dised then, which would make them look cardboard. Obviously I can't share my 3D viewing experiences with you, Brian, but can assure you that when done properly - and viewed properly - the results are vastly superior to watching mere cardboard cut-outs !! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Gaff wrote:
All of this seems to be a complete waste of time. I was talking to some people who had been to this Lion King thing in 3D I notice the panto at the Royal Theatre Notingham is being advertised as "3D", whatever next? http://www.trch.co.uk/index.aspx?articleid=14979 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
David Kennedy wrote: Michael Chare wrote: AIUI 3D TV is not a big seller, however if you buy a good quality TV you tend to get 3D anyway. Not sure about the big seller bit but I do wonder what the point is of having a 3d tv. Surely you are paying for something that is of very little use. A bit like an umbrella with a sunroof? since an umbrella* is actually to provide shade, you might want both. *umbra = latin for shade. The French, of course, have both a "parasol" and a "parapluie". -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:05:04 +0000, Andy Burns
wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: All of this seems to be a complete waste of time. I was talking to some people who had been to this Lion King thing in 3D I notice the panto at the Royal Theatre Notingham is being advertised as "3D", whatever next? http://www.trch.co.uk/index.aspx?articleid=14979 Scoff not! It says "with amazing 3D special effects". -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|