![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 19/11/2011 00:42, J G Miller wrote:
On Friday, November 18th, 2011, at 20:35:05h +0000, Bill Wright wrote: J G Miller wrote: Probably not at the time of year when propagation by inversion is most likely. That doesn't make any difference because an inverted signal still has the same polarisation. I know this because sometimes I accidentally install aerials upside down. I should have stated more explicitly -- temperature inversion effects. Whoosh? Which leads on to the question of polarisation -- is it correct that vertically polarized transmissions are less prone to be propagated by temperature inversion effects and this part of the reason why some mainland transmitters have changed from horizontal to vertical polarization to minimize interference with English tranSmitters, eg Egem on channel 22V http://www.ab9il.NET/space-weather/spacewx4.html But isn't there another effect that gives HP an advantage? -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|