![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dickie Mint" wrote in message ... Not seen any mention in these hallowed walls. Visited the son in Sheffield Wednesday & Thursday. Saw a strange fault where the sound would suddenly go way out of lip sync on HD channels. Sometimes many seconds. I saw it on his new Sharp Freeview HD telly, but he says it happens on another one in the bedroom and others have mentioned seeing it to. Its fairly normal for freeview - we'll eventually get used to it just like Americans who move here eventually get used to 50Hz flicker. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Woody wrote:
Sorry Bill, wrong use of expression. What I meant is that if there is an incoming ghost then attenuating the incoming signal may reduce the ghost enough that it does not upset the decoder. The attenuator will reduce the wanted and unwanted signals by the same amount, so the ratio between the two will stay the same. As you rightly say you can get a perfectly good picture from a relatively weak signal provided the quality is good. If the incoming quality is suffering for any reason then attenuating the signal - assuming there is enough present - may remove whatever is offending and leave a better quality signal which needs less processing. It won't remove whatever is offending. Unwanted signals do not 'disappear below the noise' when attenuated; they merely add to the noise. If what you said was right we would have been able to remove ghosting by the use of attenuators. That was not the case. We would also be able to improve the BER of DVB-T when there is co-channel interference by the use of attenuators. Again, that is not the case. Seriously, and I don't want to be rude, but are you having a laugh? Bill |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 13/11/2011 22:58, Glyn Morgan wrote:
snip ... Apologies for such a long explanation, which I hope makes sense. I also ought to point out that I have not been involved in this for over three years since I retired in 2008 .Glyn Thanks, Glyn, nice to hear from you!! I've not only been retired for over 6 years now, but I never grasped the more complex bits in the first place! And thank you for putting up with me at the time. PL is looking into it, as several people have reported it on different transmitters, and with different sets, in case it is maybe a source problem. Richard |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|