On 17/01/2011 15:40, Java Jive wrote:
Doh! However did Ofcom and I ever miss that!

Another oddity I've only just noticed is the ERPs from Alderney (CI
region). Is the BBC-B/HD mux really 10 dB below the other two? I
suppose it well might be, for fairly obvious reasons, but it could
equally well be a typo.

--
Andy

Andy Wade wrote:
On 17/01/2011 15:40, Java Jive wrote:
Doh! However did Ofcom and I ever miss that!

Another oddity I've only just noticed is the ERPs from Alderney (CI
region). Is the BBC-B/HD mux really 10 dB below the other two? I
suppose it well might be, for fairly obvious reasons, but it could
equally well be a typo.

I can never see the point of having muxes at different levels. It just
causes hassle. If one has to be low they should all be low.

Bill

On 18/01/2011 00:48, Andy Wade wrote:
On 17/01/2011 15:43, Mark Carver wrote:

I'll put my money on Ch 30.

That triggered a mental image of a roulette wheel numbered 21 to 60 (or
62 or 68, take your pick). So now we know how they do the spectrum
planning...

Ha, nothing would surprise me !

I did apply some logic to my guess, currently Derby uses Ch 48 for BBC 1
and 30 for ITV. Post DSO Ch48 is allocated to to BBC A, so Ch 30 is a
likely candidate for D3/4. What odds are Ladbrokes giving ?


--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

http://www.paras.org.uk/

Mark Carver wrote:
On 18/01/2011 00:48, Andy Wade wrote:
On 17/01/2011 15:43, Mark Carver wrote:

I'll put my money on Ch 30.

That triggered a mental image of a roulette wheel numbered 21 to 60 (or
62 or 68, take your pick). So now we know how they do the spectrum
planning...

Ha, nothing would surprise me !

I did apply some logic to my guess, currently Derby uses Ch 48 for BBC 1
and 30 for ITV. Post DSO Ch48 is allocated to to BBC A, so Ch 30 is a
likely candidate for D3/4. What odds are Ladbrokes giving ?

There's always been a bit of overlap with Belmont.

Bill