![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| uk.tech.digital-tv (Digital TV - General) (uk.tech.digital-tv) Discussion of all matters technical in origin related to the reception of digital television transmissions, be they via satellite, terrestrial or cable. Advertising is forbidden, with no exceptions. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some people say unplug your aerial during lightning storms?
Is there not a better (and safer!) solution? I've told this story before on here, but anyway - Years ago we had a customer who reached behind the telly to unplug the aerial just at the moment lightning hit the tree just down the road. She was thrown from the front of the house to the back, and was found unconscious under the kitchen sink with a broken arm. There was a track across the wall betwen the aerial downlead and the nearby mains outlet. Bill |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message ,
Wrightsaerials writes Some people say unplug your aerial during lightning storms? Is there not a better (and safer!) solution? I've told this story before on here, but anyway - Years ago we had a customer who reached behind the telly to unplug the aerial just at the moment lightning hit the tree just down the road. She was thrown from the front of the house to the back, and was found unconscious under the kitchen sink with a broken arm. There was a track across the wall betwen the aerial downlead and the nearby mains outlet. Interesting. What do you think the path of the strike was? A secondary strike on to the TV aerial, thence across the wall to mains earth? With the lady in parallel? Mike -- M.J.Powell |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
later used another by
sitting too close to an electric fire and managed to set its tail on fire ,shot across the room like a damaged plane in a war film. I read this out to my family and they all hooted with mirth, except the cats who seemed to think it was a serious matter. shot across the room like a damaged plane in a war film. What a lovely simile! I'll plaigiarise it later! We have a family story about my grandad's twin brother, who apparently tied a 'wickwack' (home made firework) to the neighbour's cat's tail. This resulted in some discord in the street concerning the rights and wrongs of his action, and finally the family moved from Nottinghamshire to Yorkshire as a result. Bill |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've told this story before on here, but anyway -
Years ago we had a customer who reached behind the telly to unplug the aerial just at the moment lightning hit the tree just down the road. She was thrown from the front of the house to the back, and was found unconscious under the kitchen sink with a broken arm. There was a track across the wall betwen the aerial downlead and the nearby mains outlet. Interesting. What do you think the path of the strike was? Maybe the shock she received was the result of induced voltage in the aerial downlead (EMP as they call it when it comes from a nuclear bomb). The track across the wall to ground wasn't very dramatic. I can't remember exactly why I was there, but presumably there had been some damage to the aerial or cable. I've seen a lot of lightning damage over the years, and it's always weird. Bill |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Wrightsaerials" wrote in message [slightly reformatted] I've told this story before on here, but anyway - Years ago we had a customer who reached behind the telly to unplug the aerial just at the moment lightning hit the tree just down the road. She was thrown from the front of the house to the back, and was found unconscious under the kitchen sink with a broken arm. There was a track across the wall betwen the aerial downlead and the nearby mains outlet. Interesting. What do you think the path of the strike was? Maybe the shock she received was the result of induced voltage in the aerial downlead (EMP as they call it when it comes from a nuclear bomb). Yes a potential difference but unlikely to be EMP, the dynamics are much slower in the period building up to a strike when I think the above conditions occured. This requires length explanation: The conditions for a lightning occurs when friction between moving layers of atmosphere, strip electrons from atoms in the top layer. (ie a cold layer of air pushes under a warm moist layer forcing it upwards. The warm air cools rapidly and dumps its moisture as rain) Static electricity. The electrons are grounded and concentrate in the ground immediately below the mass of electron deficient atoms above as they seek to return*. Electron deficient atoms are positively charged whilst electrons are negatively charged. As the friction continues the potential difference across the intervening layer of air increases to a point when breakdown of its insulation occurs. (sheet lightning occurs when the electrons are not grounded but in a separate area of sky). What happens when the actual strike occurs is that the bits of air underneath the positive area is ionised by the stress. 'Feelers' seek downwards through weaker areas like cracks spread in a weak dam (more polluted, wettter, more particulates, whatever?) Once a complete path (crack?) downwards has been established the electrons will rush upwards through it superheating the air, causing an electromagnetic pulse and a bang. Note: electricity flows from negative to positive (it is only considered to flow in the opposite direction for historic legacy reason) Thus, though the feelers work downward (the glowing streaks you see before the actual strike), lightning itself strikes upwards. Of course an awful lot of things are happening in these circumstance making precise explanations of consequences hard to analyse and somewhat speculative. An electrical lightning conductor, if placed high enough (on a steeple say) acts more to prevent a strike in its vicinity than attract one. Electrons flow upwards through the conductor (as there is a potential difference or electrical field between the ground and the steeple top) and leech or leak into the atmosphere thus inhibiting the potential difference in the atmosphere from rising high enough to cause a breakdown, though this would depend on how fast the potential is rising. Under these circumstance there will be a heavy flow up through the conductor, which is why heavy straps are used to prevent meltdown. A roof aerial will perform a similar function to a lightning conductor but in a more limited sense as it is much lower and the cable is much thinner. But certainly an aerial is still much higher than the ground and there will be a potential difference (possibly millions of V's if directly under the area of greatest stress) between the top and the bottom causing a small (or large) current to flow, especially if the cable has a reasonably good ground path through a TV. If the base of the cable has no such path, unplugged and dangling say, then no current can flow through it and the (+ve) potential at its base may be the same as that at the top. Clearly there will be a much shorter path between the base of the cable and a electron rich ground point (-ve) than there is between the roof and the ground, short enough perhaps for a breakdown to occur across the gap. Thus there may be a flash from the dangling lead to a power socket even though there is no general lightning strike at the time. Touching such a cable (ie unplugging it) during a period building up to a strike, could be dangerous as the person concerned would make a good enough ground path across the high voltage. The moral: Keep away from aerial leads during thunderstorms especially if not reasonably grounded. Rather a burnt out earthed cable than a dangerous one with a high voltage on it. Less likelihood of injury and more work for aerial riggers. *Cows please note: there will be a potential difference in the ground radiating outwards from the concentration of electrons, you are advised to stand on one leg during storms. -- Les Hellawell Greetings from : YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Les Hellawell
writes This requires length explanation: The conditions for a lightning occurs when friction between moving layers of atmosphere, strip electrons from atoms in the top layer. (ie a cold layer of air pushes under a warm moist layer forcing it upwards. The warm air cools rapidly and dumps its moisture as rain) Static electricity. The electrons are grounded and concentrate in the ground immediately below the mass of electron deficient atoms above as they seek to return*. Electron deficient atoms are positively charged whilst electrons are negatively charged. As the friction continues the potential difference across the intervening layer of air increases to a point when breakdown of its insulation occurs. (sheet lightning occurs when the electrons are not grounded but in a separate area of sky). This predicates that a ground strike can only occur when it's raining? Mike -- M.J.Powell |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for taking the trouble to answer that in such detail, Les
Bill |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|