Thread: OT question
View Single Post
  #10  
Old December 25th 17, 08:21 AM posted to uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 639
Default OT question

On 24/12/17 22:53, Norman Wells wrote:
On 24/12/2017 22:01, Indy Jess John wrote:
On 24/12/2017 20:43, Bill Wright wrote:
What are the parameters that set the speed of electromagnetic
transmission in a vacuum? I've googled everywhere but I can't find the
answer. It's easy enough to find the figure but WHY? Why not
29,979,245.8 metres per second or 2,997,924,580 metres per second?

Bill


You have to bear in mind that the metre is an arbitrary distance based
on the circumference of the Earth, and a second was a fraction of the
duration of the Earth's orbit, finally fixed as a number that is
9,192,631,770 cycles of the radiation produced by the transition
between two levels of the caesium 133 atom.

Admittedly we have got nothing better to describe the speed of light,
but it does explain why that speed when calculated isn't a
conveniently memorable number.


I think what he's asking is why it's a constant, ie what makes it so,
and why it is what it is rather than something else?

Got any answer?


Because if it wasnt what it is, the world wouldn't be what it is, and in
all likelihood he wouldn't be wherever here is to ask such damn fool
questions.


--
New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in
the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in
someone else's pocket.